01
Map
Build a local map of behaviors and their discoverable test links.
Independent verification for AI-written code
Less time validating AI-written code. Clearer evidence before release.
TestMojo maps test gaps, focuses your coding agent on risky behavior, and checks whether its tests actually catch a failure.
Use alongside your coding assistantClaude Code · Codex · Cursor · CopilotView setup instructions →
Exposure mappedBehaviors ranked by structure, churn and test linkage.
MAPPEDGenerated expectation challengedExecution caught an incorrect error-message assertion.
CAUGHTTest expectation correctedThe expected value was checked against the real source.
CHECKEDTwo generated tests provedMutation checks closed both corrected methods.
PROVENOne existing test provedThe repository’s test caught a cancellation-state mutation.
PROVENInside the published repository analysis
The generated test was wrong. Running it caught the mistake.
On a Go workflow server, a generated test assumed an error would repeat the message passed into it. The implementation returned a fixed string instead.
Execution exposed that incorrect expectation. The test was corrected from the source, then challenged with a mutation check. The run closed two generated-test proofs and one proof from the repository’s existing suite.
Follow the evidence →
Three proven behaviors out of 8,726 mapped. Name matches and static links remain separate from executed proof.
Read the full analysis and method →From a test gap to a result you can review.
Start with the free local tool. For a guided evaluation, bring one pull request and the test command your team already uses.
02
Prioritize
Rank exposure so your team knows which gaps to investigate first.
03
Generate
Use your chosen model to draft a test for a selected behavior.
04
Prove
Run the test and challenge the behavior. Record what the execution establishes.
What engineering leaders noticed
More tests aren’t the goal. Better protection is.
“One npx command and TestMojo was running against our repo, no signup, no account, nothing leaving the machine. For a team that can't ship its codebase to a third-party scanner, that's the difference between trying a tool and not trying it at all.”
Tamaz KhunjuaCEO, Entalpa
“TestMojo ran on-prem and generated end-to-end tests from our real product artifacts. Its user-experience-driven testing exposed coverage gaps traditional QA often misses.”
Adnan AshrafDirector of Product Management, Cisco
“Even with high code coverage, gaps slipped through. What they delivered wasn't automation, it was intelligence focused on the workflows that drive our business.”
Ram K.Engineering Director, Belcorp
“We ran TestMojo head to head against several top tools. Its coverage, prioritization, and clarity far exceeded everything else. Nothing else came close.”
Russell BrandManaging Director, Responsible Solutions
Testimonials were given under the OrangePro name, now TestMojo. Platform quotes describe earlier versions, not results from the one-PR evaluation.
Plans and pricing
Run locally for free. Discuss platform access when you need more.
The free tool is self-serve. Team and Enterprise access is arranged with our team: confirm your stack, integrations and deployment needs before committing.
Free
Free
The local MCP engine. One repository at a time.
- Full behavior-coverage report
- Priority gap ranking
- Test generation with your model key
- Dynamic proof via mutation oracle
- Runs locally
- TypeScript, Python, Go and Java local map
- MIT licensed
Team
$499/ month
Multi-repository context and a persistent knowledge graph.
- Everything in Free
- Unlimited repositories and reports
- Knowledge graph across pull requests
- Test history and regression tracking
- Jira, TestRail and Slack integrations
- Private repositories via GitHub App
- Playwright, Cypress, Jest and pytest exports
- Team dashboard, email and Slack support
Enterprise
Custom
On-premises deployment, identity controls and dedicated support.
- Everything in Team
- SSO with SAML or OIDC
- Custom service-level agreement
- On-premises deployment option
- Custom model configuration
- Audit logs and compliance reporting
- Dedicated account manager
- Production incident correlation
Want help evaluating one pull request?
The 30-minute scoping call is free. Evaluation scope, deliverables and any fee are agreed before work starts.
Frequently asked questions
What can I use right now?
Run the free, open-source local map in your repository. It ranks behaviors and discoverable test evidence without an account or model key. Optional test generation uses your chosen model key. For a guided evaluation or paid platform access, book a scoping call with our team.
Does TestMojo replace Claude Code, Codex or CI?
No. Use it alongside your coding assistant and existing test runner. The local map identifies exposure; generated tests still need execution, and a mutation check establishes whether a test detects a deliberate behavior change. A static link alone is not proof.
How is this different from code coverage or test selection?
Coverage shows which code ran. Test selection picks which tests to run. TestMojo finds the important workflows with missing or weak test evidence, adds a focused test, and checks that it catches the failure.
Does our code leave our environment?
The analysis runs locally. Optional test generation sends selected context to the model provider you choose, using your key.
Do we have to send the whole codebase to a model?
No. The map and the risk ranking run without a model. If you generate tests, only the context for the selected risky behaviors goes to your model.
What if TestMojo cannot run our tests?
It reports the result as unknown, names the blocker, and gives the manual next step. It never calls an unchecked change low risk.
Which languages work today?
The free local map covers TypeScript, Python, Go and Java. Test execution and proof depend on the repository, framework and test command. We confirm that fit during scoping rather than assuming every stack is supported.
What does a one-pull-request evaluation involve?
One repository, one real pull request and your existing test command. We assess validation effort, useful test protection and execution cost on that change, and return a test patch with a record of what was checked. The first call takes 30 minutes and is free. Any evaluation fee is agreed before work starts.
Will it lower our CI costs?
We do not promise that. Checking a test means running it again, so it adds some runner time. What we aim to reduce today is engineering effort: the time spent validating and reviewing changes. Each evaluation reports the added runner time.
See what your tests establish on your own code.
Start with a free 30-minute scoping call. Any evaluation fee is agreed before work begins.
Scope one PR evaluation